How “tough-love” Democrats can recapture voters

I describe myself as a tough-love Democrat.

Tough because I seek fiscal austerity, consequences for wrong doing (do the crime, do the time), and efficiency in program implementation (cut out the waste)

Love because I want everybody to be fed so they don’t starve, clothed so they don’t freeze, patched up when they get sick (without loosing their house or going bankrupt) and educated without paying for this education for the rest of their life.

Everybody along the political spectrum usually can agree to the above definition, unless they have an over-riding hot-button issue or they abhor anything related to the Democratic Party. If their minds are made up and their hearts are closed, they will never be won over to the Democratic camp.

I offer the following practical examples of how tough-love might engender unity over dissention.

Traffic lights throughout my state are slated to be upgraded to motion sensitive systems thanks the the Build Back Better funding. The end goal is to mitigate the backlog of vehicles waiting at lights causing congestion and adding to pollution.

Who could be against this? Liberals and Conservatives and everybody in between seems to hate traffic jams.

Democrats should make sure they get credit for this.

Let’s not stop there. I suggest adding the following component to make sure we bring into the tent the “law and order” aficionados. I propose adding cameras to all traffic light improvements. Maybe we could even add cameras to all those overhead signs on super highways and all those infrastructure bridge upgrades that are planned. If the cameras can document persons who blow through red lights and get convictions for anyone hurt or killed by their negligence, who could be against that? If this more robust camera system can assist with convictions of persons who have committed crimes and are fleeing from police, let’s do it. This is especially important in this day and age of witness reluctance and the dubious quality of eye witness accounts of crimes. The “love” is the infrastructure improvement. The “tough” component is the clamping down on criminality whether it is drag racers, fleeing criminals or even terrorists who might consider detonating our bridges and infrastructure. Democrats need to make it very clear that we are rebuilding society (love) while making it safer (tough) and not just “spending money” as others so often accuse them of doing. Lastly, for those on both sides of the political aisle who are concerned about “big brother” and “government overreach” attributed to such a comprehensive camera system, it should be very clear that images are only to be saved and used in the event that a crime is committed. Cameras unlike humans have no emotions or biases. For persons worried about overreach, let them explain their reluctance to the victims of crimes, especially those cases which are unsolved because of lack of evidence.

My second example of how Democrats can re-capture the market for those who seek a better society without outrageous costs includes the following

Build Back Better includes proposals for augmenting the human infrastructure in addition to the “bricks and mortar” projects. This includes more funding for mental health, education, etc. All good and well intentioned stuff (aka, “love”). But lets always bake in consequences and follow-up (aka, “tough”) for every dollars spent on the “soft stuff”. I make this recommendation after 15 years working weekends as a mall cop who has seen plenty of fights, disorderly conduct and angry outbursts. When any of the aforementioned disruptive incidents occur, why can’t the combatants be required to attend a therapeutic/counseling session to get to the root cause of the angry outburst and begin the process of behavior management. The number and intensity/duration of the counselling sessions could be dictated by the severity of the offenses, the depth of the anger and repeat offender histories. This restorative justice approach is the “love” component. If the combatants do not agree to this therapeutic schedule or if they fail to complete the proscribed series of counselling sessions, let the criminal charges be applied. This is the “tough” consequences component. For too long, the refrain has been “lock em up” . It has proven to be unworkable and ineffective and in some cases makes a bad situation worse. More recently, a hands-off, “leave em alone” approach to let combatants blow off steam for fear of being too heavy handed is equally unworkable and ineffective. In sum, if Democrats could corner the market with a mix of restorative justice (love) for those who are amenable to reformation and criminal charges (tough) for those who reject therapy. This approach will entice conservative law and order advocates without pandering to vigilante instincts.

Stay tuned for future blogs that delve deeper into criminal justice tough-love proposals. In the meantime, any and all suggestions and comments are most appreciated.

Speaking & Listening In The Age of Sound Bites

This is a reblog of a post I issued back on 3/1/21. I was motivated to repost it because I recently participated in a wonderful series of mindfulness seminars available at my job. The issues and response strategies remain the same so I felt it appropriate to re-visit. Plus, Thanksgiving dinner is fast approaching so advice to counter animosity at the dinner table seemed timely

Dunn Writes Well

The growing number of outlandish conspiracy theories and factual inaccuracies (aka fake news) prompted me to list some responses that I present for consideration and further discussion.

I propose a multi-tier level of responses ranging from conciliatory to debatable to “oh hell no, that’s crazy talk”.

Conciliatory and empathetic:

  • “You sound like you have a lot of pent up anger. What brought you to this position?”
  • “Have you held this belief for a long time or did you come to believe it more recently?”
  • I can see how your life experiences have shaped these beliefs. Likewise, are you willing to consider how they might be inaccurate?

Within this category might be the admonishment of “walking a mile in the others shoes” and “considering both sides of the coin”

Debatable and pleasantly/respectfully argumentative:

  • What is your source?
  • Have you checked other sources?
  • Have you absolutely verified the facts. Likewise, have you…

View original post 259 more words

Speaking & Listening In The Age of Sound Bites

The growing number of outlandish conspiracy theories and factual inaccuracies (aka fake news) prompted me to list some responses that I present for consideration and further discussion.

I propose a multi-tier level of responses ranging from conciliatory to debatable to “oh hell no, that’s crazy talk”.

Conciliatory and empathetic:

  • “You sound like you have a lot of pent up anger. What brought you to this position?”
  • “Have you held this belief for a long time or did you come to believe it more recently?”
  • I can see how your life experiences have shaped these beliefs. Likewise, are you willing to consider how they might be inaccurate?

Within this category might be the admonishment of “walking a mile in the others shoes” and “considering both sides of the coin”

Debatable and pleasantly/respectfully argumentative:

  • What is your source?
  • Have you checked other sources?
  • Have you absolutely verified the facts. Likewise, have you verified the alleged lies?
  • Why do you think the vast majority of people and news sources are not on board with this conspiracy theory and your interpretation of news and reality?
  • If your conspiracy theory and interpretation of reality is true, what are you planning to do with it? What is your call to action? What do you want me to do?
  • How can you be sure that you are not being gamed and duped by proponents of this conspiracy theory?
  • This category includes the theme of “let’s agree to disagree but not be disagreeable”.

Hell No…..this is patently wrong. It goes beyond wrong and it’s morally offensive.

Examples of this would include the following:

  • Holocausts deniers
  • Mass shooting deniers

Responses might include the following:

  • Don’t ever bring this up again with me. If you insist on doing so , it may be necessary to part ways.
  • Let’s talk again when you come back to reality.
  • Were you abducted by aliens and was a probe inserted with these ideas?
  • Have you been taking your meds?
  • Do you have any idea how hurtful these ideas are to the family/friends of the victims of the atrocities that you are denying existed?
  • Your interpretation is not only factually inaccurate, it is morally wrong because of it’s hateful, hurtful nature. If we continue on this path, it is likely to lead to atrocity, bigotry, and dehumanization.

I can not in good conscience join you on this journey to hell and I will do everything in my power to dissuade others from accompanying you.

Society By Membership

In my 2 years of blogging, this is the blog I had the most difficulty composing. My consternation evolves around the desire to NOT send the wrong message or be mis-interpreted. That said, I still wanted to create a post that provides a possible link between the left and the right camps. Progressive visionaries on the left (sometimes unrealistic) and disaffected, conservatives on the right (sometimes reactionary) bent on upholding family values. So here goes…..

I experience increasing levels uncivility and ungovernability. I’m thinking that a MEMBERSHIP based society and economic system, might be the way to go.

I cite the following experiences and scenarios:

RETAIL in general and MALLS in particular…..

Retail: BJ’s and Costco seem to have successfully pioneered the “members only” format. You can NOT just roam off the street into their stores. As a job developer finding jobs for clients , I was turned back at the entrance and could not even get to their human resources department. Being a membership entity, they know at all times who is in their store, when they were there and what they purchased. It got me to thinking about all the other places you can not roam into unannounced and uninvited, namely country clubs, golf courses, gyms, etc. Good for security, analytics, etc.

Mall: The common areas such as the food court, lobbies, vestibules and public corridors have become no-mans-lands, free-for-alls for youths who want to hang out and cause trouble for hours on end. When asked to leave they shout back to mall cops and regular cops alike. All sense of respect has evaporated over the last couple of years and everyone is terrified to take a stand and assert authority. Home delivery of whatever is needed be that food, products or services will replace the public arenas because the average person and patron wants no part of that mayhem. With memberships comes deliveries to fortified homes compete with alarms, cameras and pre-arranged services so there will be no interacting with strangers who have not been vetted.

This also got me to thinking about a prior blog in which I proposed gated communities for persons of all income groups, not just the wealthy. Why not extend this notion of limited access and intelligent access to all establishments and situations. A horrific crime committed some years ago in a neighborhood where I worked while I was trying to provide affordable housing and increased stability still haunts me. It provides the impetus for this proposal. An immigrant owner of a corner deli was shot point blank with a shotgun totting 16 year old girl during a robbery. Here we have a hard working immigrant trying to pursue “the American dream” while laboring in a distressed neighborhood commonly referred to as a “food desert” where there is a lack of grocery options. I suggest that the hard working, honest, law abiding residents of this neighborhood might support a “members only” shopping experience. Both they and the merchant might then shop/trade in a safer, more peaceful environment. Under this scenario, I envision somewhat of a speakeasy environment reminiscent of the 1920’s during the prohibition years. Ironically, we might deploy a 1920’s tactic in 2021. Access control through physical infrastructure (bullet resistant doors/windows and buzz in/buzz out entries) complete with plenty of closed circuit cameras would provide security for both merchant and shoppers. Maybe even utilizing facial recognition technology (with participants permission of course). Couple this with membership and you might be able to prevent killing of innocents be they shop keepers in armed robberies or mall patrons in mass shootings. It got me to wondering, how many more vulnerable front line service workers, teachers, and co-workers lives might be saved if membership was implemented and access was denied to those intending to disrupt or worse yet harm.

On a much milder note, a members-only system would provide retailers and businesses serving the general public with greater ability to control their space and the quality of life for them and their patrons. I offer this thought after years of experience as a mall cop dealing with career shoplifters and belligerent, offensive patrons. Rescinding membership by banning persons who repeatedly steal, curse, spit (yes spit) would bring control back into the lives of these struggling merchants and a sense of pleasantness and security to the customers who are truly customers.

My humble observation having worked for decades in distressed neighborhoods and struggling malls, is that the average person wants more control in their life. They want nothing more than to shop in peace, wake up in the morning to find that their car has not been stolen, and walk about without hearing the F-bomb uttered by every other person they encounter. As the social fabric deteriorates with less confidence in cops to police, teachers to teach and parents to nurture, the demand for a members-only segmentation of the population will only increase. When people feel they have no control over their environment, a sense of hostility grows. They feel they are ignored and insignificant. This might explain the groundswell of conservative, nationalistic populism, tribalism and polarization. It might explain these resentment sentiments among persons of all socio-economic and multi-cultural backgrounds.

I emphatically note that civil rights can not be allowed to be trampled upon when considering a membership based society. Rule of law must still be the law of the land. However, if one’s documented behaviors (be it proven as criminal or disruptive in nature) causes their membership to be revoked or adjusted, then we might instill a much needed sense of personal responsibility for the consequences of our actions. Moving in this direction would go a long way toward addressing the sense that social norms have run amuck and nobody is held accountable for their actions any more. Depending upon the level of infraction or disruption, the suspension of membership could be adjusted accordingly. Draconian methods and criminalization of anti-social events might be avoided. Who knows, with suspensions of memberships and re-instatements based upon good behavior, we might even bake in some positive behavior modification. It is my hope that this potpourri of ideas will appeal to persons of all socio-political, cultural and economic stripes. If implemented rationally and without malice or prejudice, we might create a society that we all deep down desire. Maybe this is something that persons from every corner of the political/cultural spectrum could agree upon. The common denominator would be the desire to move about in society in safety and with a sense of civility and pleasantness. Now that’s something to think about.

Career: Military vs. Peace Corps

We’re all familiar with the military career and all that comes with that:

  • Benefits, pension
  • Lifetime guarantee of “3 hots and a cot”
  • Health care, VA benefits
  • Sense of purpose, camaraderie
  • Sense of order, chain of command, discipline
  • Potential to gain skills, learn, grow
  • Potential to “rise up in the ranks”
  • Potential to “see the world”
  • Serve your country, make the world better (maybe)

So what if you wanted all the above described features but was not keen on being sent wherever and whenever Uncle Sam wanted. The military is not like ordering from a restaurant menu selecting only those items that appeal to you. What if you did not agree with the mission or understand what was the mission? Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan come to mind.

Might joining a revamped and robust Peace Corps with both a foreign and domestic component appeal to you?

What are my motivations behind this proposal?

  • On the foreign front….we need to identify those countries that can be salvaged where we can “win their hearts and minds” thereby stabilizing them and preventing an exodus of immigrants. Various Central American countries come to mind along with moderate “hot spots” throughout the rest of the world.
  • On the domestic front….we need to identify those distressed areas (be they urban, aging suburban or rural) where an infusion of positivity will turn the tide of despair and inertia.

Who might be a candidate for a Peace Corp type career that was modeled upon a military career? Probably a person who….

  • Wants to work productively for the balance of their life without worrying that the job will disappear, medical benefits will lapse, career advancement and learning opportunities will be limited.
  • Is not particularly concerned about getting RICH. Having a guarantee of a roof over their head, food in their belly and a doctor to see them when they get sick is more important that the rat race of chasing the evaporating American Dream of the big house surrounded by the picket fence and the mountains of debt. Minimalists and survivalists are encouraged to apply. Materialist’s not so much.
  • Has an ability to contribute their talents and advance their skills within the context of a natural curiosity about other cultures, lifestyles and circumstances (be they foreign or domestic).
  • Wants to serve their country but not necessarily in a militaristic fashion.

So what might be some of the missions and tasks to be tackled by the domestic Peace Corps?

  • An army (had to use that phrase since in keeping with the military analogy) of gardeners. Establish community gardens and backyard gardens (reminiscent of the Victory Gardens of the WW2 era) that would provide health fruits/vegetables, encourage self-sufficiency, environmental friendliness, just to name a few advantages. See my upcoming blog where I elaborate on this notion of a nation wide gardening campaign
  • An army of tutors and mentors to get students re-engaged in learning, practical skill training and goal setting. See my upcoming blog where I elaborate on this proposal to revamp our approach to teaching and mentoring so we move toward micro-teaching/mentoring rather than the warehousing of students. Teaching and mentoring slides more into the category of life coaching.
  • An army of community mentors working with the criminal justice system supporting the police (not replacing them) providing the extra coaching/mentoring for those whose issues (addictions, anger, depression, etc.) are sucking them into the criminal justice system. This army of counselors/mentors would enable cops to be cops investigating and apprehending truly bad ass violent criminals and thieves. See my upcoming blog for more on this augmenting (not defunding) of police and the criminal justice system.

As for the Foreign version of the Peace Corps…..

  • Follow a formula as outlined above concerning the domestic version but adapt it to the needs of the host country.
  • Make sure participants are adequately protected. Even though we would not be sending them to the world hottest spots, we do not want to set them up as potential hostages or victims. This is becoming increasingly important as world affairs continues to deteriorate and American’s have an increasingly large target on their backs. In addition to having a guardian presence (subtle military presence nearby just in case), the participants need to be well trained in self-defense and survival skills. I propose extension of this martial arts/weapons training and self-defense training to the domestic participants to be ready to react to increasingly hostile environments fueled by animosity, polarization, bigotry and downright orneriness. I offer this suggestion after 15 years as a mall cop and over 30 years working in distressed neighborhoods. An upcoming blog will elaborate on this notion of creating a more defensive citizenry prepared to counter punch when attacked. To be clear, the spirit of this blog will be vigilance not vigilantism.

Various components of the above described outside-of-the-box proposals are baked into my upcoming novel about an eclectic extended family in a near term dystopian world, so stay tuned for details. In the meantime, let me know your thoughts/reactions and if anybody wants to read some or all of this novel in its draft form and provide feedback, I would be delighted to supply you with as much or as little as you desire.

Irish Wake…..American Wake

Most folks (especially of Irish decent) are familiar with the term “Irish Wake”. For those needing a refresher course, it started with the Great Famine/Great Migration of the Irish, many of whom emigrated to the USA (and anywhere else) to escape hunger and suppression. They were well aware that once they moved to a distant land, there was no looking back. It was doubtfull they would see their Irish family and friends again. So they scheduled one last big party to see them off and say their Good Bye’s. Few of the folks from the “Old Country” ever reunited with their fellow countrymen. However, sometimes when they did, it was difficult to re-connect. They still shared common origins. They shared memories of good times. But there was “water under the bridge”, changes in latitudes, changes in attitudes (to steal a line from a Jimmy Buffet’s song Margaritaville) and as American author Thomas Wolfe said “You can never go home again”.

Fast forward to contemporary America. We are not fleeing to a distant land (or are we?). Today there are cultural, political, attitudinal differences that separate us by many miles even though we live amongst each other. We shop together and travel the same streets but seem to be driving in completely different directions. We have fond memories of good times together. There were barbeques to attend in summer and Christmas presents to open in winter. There was the nightly news when we generally agreed with Walter Cronkite as he signed off with his signature expression “And that’s the way it was September 11, 1968 (or whatever date it happened to be). Bumper stickers on cars were limited to announcements of a mountain climbed or a beach visited. Now the back sides of vehicles are overflowing with hateful, vindictive expressions of angst. Any conversation that veers beyond the bounds of the weather and sports deteriorates into a grudge match pitching differing versions of reality.

And that brings me around to the American Wake. When irreconcilable differences of reality and attitudes preclude any sense of commonality, maybe its time for the American Wake. Let’s celebrate the good times we experienced and the reasons we got together in the first place. Let’s keep the door ajar for some future time when we can truly listen to each other, respect each others opinions and get back to normal (whatever that was). But maybe it’s time for a good old fashioned wake to acknowledge a watershed in our relationships where we “agree to disagree but not be disagreeable”. Is America at a fork in the road facing the binary decision of turning left or turning right? I offer the American Wake as more of a rotary where we can circle in the center with the option of peeling off from this relationship merry-go-round when confronted with untenable perspectives that are an anathema to our existence as a democracy.

And on that cherry note, let’s schedule an American Wake!

It all started with TV

What started? The beginning of the end of critical thought and imagination. It all started innocently in the early 1960’s. Cartoons on Saturday mornings were a treat. In the mid-1960’s the next treat for me was to watch cop shows in the evenings (if homework was done). Favorites were Adam-12, Dragnet, Mannix, Hawaii 50, just to name a few. Being an Irish-American with most of my relatives as cops, this was the preferred viewing. After school my childhood buddies would watch shows like Combat, Rat Patrol, Whirlybirds (a helicopter show) and some sort of Everglades cop show the name of which I can not recall. TV watching was consuming more of our time but cop and combat shows motivated us to reenact cop chases and military battles in the woods and swamps behind my best friends house. We still used our imagination AND got plenty of exercise, qualities and lifestyles in short supply in our media drenched world today.

There’s a reason they call TV the “boob tube”. Studies have shown that passively watching something puts the brain on hold and stifles imagination. In the beginning, TV was a blessing for parents. Kids could be entertained while parents got back to doing adult stuff. Parents could incentivize the completion of homework and tasks with the reward of TV time. It all worked well until a few unintended and unfortunate consequences occurred. They were…..

  • Gradual erosion of the principle of working and engaging in productive endeavors just because they are right and necessary. TV (and all forms of it’s media offspring) have become the ultimate bribe tools.
  • Too much of a good thing. Too much TV watching, too little thinking, too little imagination, too much procrastination.
  • Too much desensitizing violence altering our sense of reality. The line between what’s real and what’s imaginary gets blurred in TV land.
  • Time spent watching steals time spent learning, developing a skill, producing something, discovering a hobby or practicing a hobby.
  • Too much commercialization. Steady diet of commercials fuels an overly materialistic society blurring the line between what we want vs. what we need.
  • Over time and very insidiously, a steady diet of carefully crafted images colors the viewers beliefs, goals, perceptions of reality. In sum, mind control and attitudinal control.

Now consider all these observations and ramifications concerning TV and overlay todays milieu of media and social media (twitter, i-phones, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, etc.)

It’s a wonder any of us can think objectively and imagine creatively.

Being aware of this can keep us personally and nationally be on guard against these downside effects

Tipping Point:

What’s worth protesting against?

What’s worth dying for?

Everyone I encounter seems to have strong opinions in this polarized world. Well, not really everyone. Many lack any opinions and their passions evolve around the mundane of sports, gaming, shopping and tweeting.

As for the polarized persons for whom emotions run high, it got me to wondering what’s the ONE THING we all could get behind and work in unison on.

If pandemics, wildfires, and hurricanes are not unifying us, it begs the question as to why are we staying together as the USA. Our national psyche of distrust and apathy is like being in a house on fire and instead of helping each other out safely, we bicker over how did the fire start, who might have caused it and how are we going to pay for the fire damage. The only thing that unites us is the fact that we inevitably burn up together.

Have we gotten too big, too impersonal, too distracted as a nation and as a people to unite behind ONE THING, to accomplish ONE THING.

Might we need to revert to micro societies where goals and needs are starkly defined. Where there is a survival mentality, a life boat mentality.

What is the one thing that you would protest for or against?

Are you ready-willing-able to take action on this selected cause?

Are you ready to move beyond talking mode to mission driven mode?

There are no specific answers to this blog. Only you can answer these questions upon review of your heart of hearts.

As for me, the existential and long term threat is climate change, global warming and our potential extinction.

In terms of an even shorter term, immediate need, there is the increasing polarity of our society which will ultimately lead to either civil war or anarchy. Preventing that scenario from coming to fruition should in my opinion be the ONE THING that we need to get behind before it’s too late.

That said, how might we pull back from polarities brink of destruction?

First step: Take personality, emotion and personal animosity out of our interpersonal relations (be that within the family, friends, workplace, neighborhood, community, state, nation). It’s ok to have an opinion and label. It’s not ok to call me an asswhole for it.

Second step: Having removed emotional hot buttons as described above, proceed with a fact driven basis for decision making and relationships concerning the aforementioned groups (family, friends, etc.)

Third Step: Agree to disagree where there can be no compromise and the TIPPING POINT has been reached among the family, friends, co-workers, etc. Compromise and communication should be the first priority following the mantra of “walking in each others shoes”. However, there will be deal breakers that can not be overcome. We all will know them when we see them.

One Priority, One Project

What would be the one project we all could engage in to build a renewed sense of community, unity and purpose?

So many good causes, so many non-profits. Just check the list of the United Way and the Community Calendar of any community and you will be overwhelmed by the selections.

All worthy causes and yet…..So little time, So little energy, So limited resources.

Got me to thinking….Where in the world do people unite around the same time over the same thing?

Sure there’s Christmas and Easter in Christian leaning societies. But this is not uniformly practiced and sadly other than the exchanging of presents and running up credit card debt, not much more is accomplished.

In the USA, we have our holidays and remembrance days (Presidents Day, Veterans Day, Memorial Day, 4th of July and Thanksgiving). More recently and sadly we have 911 Remembrance Day.

The 911 remembrance brings me to reflect upon the nation wide movement of remembrance in Israel concerning the holocaust. My understanding is that for a defined time on one day….EVERYTHING stops in Israel for a remembrance of victims and a resolve to never replicate the horrors of the holocaust.

This got me to thinking….What if in the USA we collectively as a nation stopped everything and devoted our time, energy and collective souls to ONE THING. Imagine the sense of unity that this would create. We might once again become the UNITED states of the United States of America.

That said, the next question to answer would be…”What would be that 1 thing that our nation did with laser sharp focus over a 24 hour period?”

For this I have no answer and am open to suggestions. The following issues come to mind:

  • Global warming/climate change
  • Gun violence

I’m mulling around the idea of somehow coming to a reconciliation or at least a communication with each other to reduce polarization and take the first step toward averting a civil war. I’m not sure of the logistics of this but my sense is that if we do not start making progress on that front, we will have no chance of tackling the other existential challenges. In sum, we need to heal ourselves first.

Following this train of thought….

  • What if we didn’t do any more political debates, which have deteriorated into shouting matches?
  • What if we didn’t spend millions on political advertising?
  • What if we required candidates to walk together through their neighborhoods and districts greeting and listening to constituents together?
  • What if we required term restrictions so candidates did not become too entrenched in the status quo and out of touch with reality?

At the most basic local level everybody (both candidates and constituents) desire the following basics: food…clothing…shelter….safety….basic education… care…opportunity for their kids.

If we were to cut away the noise of partisanship, maybe we might live in harmony and actually feel better about ourselves, out neighborhood, city, state, nation. Civil war averted. Now that’s the ONE THING we all should get behind, before it’s too late.

The Journey

May your journey begin with much fanfare and high expectations

May you not get sidetracked along the way

May the station stops be joyous ones

May you acquire no excess baggage

May you leave each station tidier than you found it

And most importantly,

May there be a transfer ticket waiting for you at the final spot.

By Greg Dunn